Who Knew What Was Happening In The Bodenweiser Case? Not Don Ayotte!

by Frank Knotts on July 16, 2014 in Blog with 22 Comments

 

 

question  Normally I do not repost other blogger’s post, from other blogs.  But in this case I couldn’t resist. What follows is a post from (Not) Don Ayotte that was posted on Delaware Politics, in its entirety, dated 7/15/14, the date is important, once you read the post you will understand.  I will also post the few comments, as they will show the entire story as it unfolded. I am posting this because (Not) Don Ayotte is running for office, AGAIN, and I believe that the things he writes have relevance.  If he is so reactionary as to write this post and the comments that follow, can he be trusted to be elected? You decide.

   Attorney General Reneges on Bodenweiser Trial Decision

By  Don Ayotte

The Attorney General’s office has reneged on announcing whether or not a decision on July 15th, to re-try or drop charges after a hung jury, ended the trial in a mistrial. The Attorney General’s office stated they were not obligated to tell him at that Point.
Judge Bradley has scheduled a conference on July 23rd to ascertain just what course of action the Attorney General’s office wants to pursue.

Prosecutor David Hume recently prosecuted another trial that ended in a hung jury, with the judge declaring it also a mistrial. In the recent trial Michael Rogers, charged with assault on a police officer, after being shot five times by DSP officer Mathew Morgan who entered the Rogers’ residence without a warrant and entered the victims bedroom and started a fight with him.
Officer Morgan fired nine rounds at Rogers in the living room of the residence after the fight was over, striking the victim five times, twice in the groin, while his 87 year-old mother was watching. Mathew Morgan has since been promoted to Corporal.
Officer Morgan was investigating an alleged hit-and-run, that claimed a license plate frame was cracked. Rogers was never charged with that alleged crime.

12 thoughts on “Attorney General Reneges on Bodenweiser Trial Decision”

  1. It has just now been released that Mr. Bodenweiser will be tried a second time. What a disservice to Delaware and a waste of taxpayer’s money.

     

  2. Seems you jumped the gun on this. It’s just been announced–and on time–that the AG’s office will retry the case.

     

  3. Yes, but I had the information that I had written about. I think the AG’s office is just a little insecure and on edge about this upcoming trial. Mr. Hume seems to be their best operative but when I observed him at the trial, he seemed to be ill prepared and highly incompetent. Of course that could have been because he didn’t have the “corpus delicti” (body of evidence) that a crime had actually been committed. In my opinion, they are hoping for a miracle and a favorable judge to redeem their sorry arses.

     

  4. Don rather than make excuses correct the byline. The Attorney Generals office didn’t renege on their announcement. Bodenweiser and his supporters all agree you should just keep your mouth shut. Your not doing him or his case any favors.

     

  5. When the trooper asked to speak to Rogers his mother let him into her home therefore a warrant wasn’t needed. You also deliberately left out Rogers mothers sworn testimony that Rogers had put the trooper in a choke hold causing her to scream at her son to let the trooper go.

     

  6. sussex countian
    July 15, 2014 at 16:49
    “Don rather than make excuses correct the byline. The Attorney Generals office didn’t renege on their announcement. Bodenweiser and his supporters all agree you should just keep your mouth shut. Your not doing him or his case any favors.”

    No excused are being made here. When I posted this article, I had the exact information that I posted from a source that received that information from the AG’s office.
    If you don’t know what you are talking about, please hold your peace and let the pros report what is actually going on.
    The Ag’s office decided at the last minute after releasing the info that I posted directly from their office. A great strategy on their part, but it won’t save their arses on a new trial, it will only prolong their utter defeat in their baseless case.

     

  8. sussex countian
    July 15, 2014 at 16:57
    “When the trooper asked to speak to Rogers his mother let him into her home therefore a warrant wasn’t needed.”

    Isn’t much trouble to coerce an aged person to let you into their home without a search warrant, is it? This so-called Trooper should be ashamed of himself.
    When he got his arse kicked in a fight he initiated, he became enraged and lost his perspective and discharged his weapon when no life threatening situation was present. What a complete ass.
    The state police promoted this intemperate idiot to show their support for his unbelievable actions.
    You forget, I interviewed the victim’s mother before the state police got to her. I don’t believe a damn thing that Mathew Morgan says. He is the perpetrator and should be prosecuted for attempted murder.

     

  11. You’re the only one who believes the crap timeline of events you claim. I wonder how Mrs Rogers would feel about you describing her as an aged person, as a way to bolster your hatred of authority. Now you try to justify the assault of a uniformed officer and then say he didn’t act correctly. I wonder what would happen if someone put you in a choke hold putting you in fear for your life what you would do. I don’t give a damn if you interviewed Mrs. Rogers or not. Now you are implying this aged person lied under oath. Ive seen aphot of this woman she hardly looks aged, professional journalists described her as looking much younger than her age, sharp and spry. If someone cared to take the time I’m sure they would find where you wrote if any trooper showed up at your house they would be greeted with a shotgun.

    Concerning your claim about the AG’s office well they made a pro hack look like a pro hack. You couldn’t wait to run your story. Even a non pro like me understands the AG’s office had until the end of court today to file their intentions.
    As for your Corpus Delicti nonsense Thomas Capano was convicted of 1st degree murder on nothing more than his confession to his lover and brother. Anne Marie Fahey’s body was never found.

    There is nothing professional about you by any stretch of the imagination. Your nothing more than the male version of Pat Fish writing on a blog site that according to you has no real relevance or impact.

     

  12. Frank doesn’t seek to intimidate. What he is doing is hardly harassment, he calls it exactly as he sees it. If you can’t handle it in a blog site that according to you has no relevance how the hell will you ever handle it in legislative hall. Your hatred for certain current elected legislators oozes out of your pores like the stench of an alcoholics sweat. Despite your belief you have self control you don’t! You pull the delete trigger faster than Trooper Morgan did . Commenters who challenge you find what they post deleted, or they are blocked.

     

  13. don

    it’s obvious that you don’t have any kind of campaign advisors. i would be happy to help you. my first bit of advice is free. stop posting, or at the very least stop commenting on your posts. actually….. just stop posting all together.

    So as you can see, (Not ) Don Ayotte jumped of the cliff to write a post instead of confirming the information he claims  he received.  I would draw your attention to his #6 comment where he first says, “When I posted this article, I had the exact information that I posted from a source that received that information from the AG’s office.” Notice he says he posted information from a source who received the information from the AG’s office. So in this sentence the information is second hand at best. However, in this very same comment (Not) Don Ayotte says, “The Ag’s office decided at the last minute after releasing the info that I posted directly from their office.” Notice that the information has now become first person. Is this simply a case of misspeaking? On a Freudian Slip? Did Don make all this up simply so he could write the post he wanted to write? Instead of waiting for the day to pass and then write the post?

    Surely a “pro” such as (Not) Don Ayotte would never make such a grammatical error.

    As you see, the news that the AG’s office had decided to prosecute a re-trial broke almost immediately after the original posting, and instead of simply taking it down and writing another post, he compounds the blunder by arguing the point. Then he closes comments and still leaves the post up.

    Finally he adds this header to the post,

    ” Update on the post:
    After receiving verification that what is written here is true, the Attorney General’s office decided at the end of the business day on July 15th to retry the Bodenweiser case a second time.    ”

    And still the post is up at the time of the writing of this post. This header is a continuation of a fantasy at best, there is nothing in the original post that is true. The AG never made any official announcement about the case, and they did not renege on anything since the deadline had not passed when the original post was written.

    If (Not) Don Ayotte has such a loose association with the truth and reality, should he be trusted with elected office? Not hardly. If he shows such bad judgment in posting such tripe while attempting to run for office, can his judgment be trusted in any matter? Not in my opinion.

    And yes, I have made mistakes in my postings, and when it is proven that I have made a mistake I own it. I admit when I am wrong, and if I would have made such a monumental mistake as this, the entire post would have been taken down with an explanation.

    I would also have to criticize the owner of Delaware Politics, David Anderson for not exercising some authority over his own site, by allowing this post to stand, and with comments shut off sensible people cannot tell the real story. Mr. Anderson is an elected official, a Dover Town Councilman, and one has to question his credibility as well.

Tagged:

22 Comments on "Who Knew What Was Happening In The Bodenweiser Case? Not Don Ayotte!"

  1. Ricky Bobby says:
    July 17, 2014 at 5:47 am

    Ayotte would not have posted the piece if he did not have a credible source. It looks like the AG’s office was planning to announce the decision on 7/15, then they released information that they were not obligated to announce their decision on 7/15 and then they decided to announce the decision on 7/15 instead of waiting until 7/23 after all. Had they waited until 7/23, Ayotte would have been on the cutting edge. The AG apparently considered reneging, changed their minds and Ayotte reported it. He posted a correction when they made up their minds. No harm, no foul.

    As to “again”, at least Ayotte is willing to run for office unlike those who just sit on the sidelines and complain.

    This post is so typical of Frank. He was back at DE Politics looking for something to pick at. He can’t stay away from his old stomping ground. I’d bet the posters there never look at his stuff unless someone specifically directs them to it. Instead of reporting and commenting on news, Frank finds fault with others who actually do. Why does anyone read this rag?

  2. Frank Knotts says:
    July 17, 2014 at 6:10 am

    Ricky B says, “Ayotte would not have posted the piece if he did not have a credible source.”, obviously you don’t know (Not) Don Ayotte.
    The says, ” Instead of reporting and commenting on news”. Well considering that (Not) Don Ayotte is running for office, this is of interest to some people, I unlike (Not) Don Ayotte do not tell people I am a journalist, or a “PRO”. I tell people I write on a blog.
    As for your convoluted explanation of the AG’s office handling of the release of information and then stating “HAD” the office reneged, then “Ayotte would have been on the cutting edge.”
    Well if, ifs and buts were candy and nuts, oh what a party we’d have”!
    And he printed no correction, he simply doubled down on the original mistake.

  3. HTM W says:
    July 17, 2014 at 8:14 am

    Mr. Knotts the above is not complete! There was also one comment (Fred thinks it was the original #6 comment) we saw written by ‘Cletus’ that was quickly removed. Many “Not Don Ayottes” after each line of his comment. It was HILARIOUS!!! It was removed before we could go back and get the screen shot (the kids aren’t here to do these things). Maybe Cletus could do the same here for all to enjoy?

    His comment was along the line of Who gets the facts right every time? Not Don Ayotte!

  4. ABDA says:
    July 17, 2014 at 11:21 am

    Ayotte probably got his original information from the Bodenweiser camp. They fed him the information so he would put up the post about their “reneging” and then when the AG’s office didn’t, they could claim they reneged on the reneging.

    Ayotte is a useful idiot. A tool used by smarter people.

  5. TrutheBeKnown says:
    July 17, 2014 at 11:30 am

    Ricky Booby

    Actually Frank is being used as a useful idiot of Ayotte. When Don’s attention was directed to this post, he just shrugged hes shoulders and said. I feel sorry for frank, nobody read his stuff unless he attacks somebody.
    Frank, you don’t have a life, but unlike Don, I don’t feel sorry for you. Don’s much too busy on the campaign field to even read your useless blather.

  6. sussex countian says:
    July 17, 2014 at 8:39 pm

    TBK Don just closes down the discussion or deletes it entirely just like he did with the Allen Harim story when he was confronted with all the distortions of truth it contained. Even when there was a threat of a lawsuit against Not Don Ayotte’s editor who he claims is his good friend he didn’t care. Not Don Ayotte is nothing more than a goosestepping pawn of Herr von Bummy

  7. Ricky Bobby says:
    July 18, 2014 at 5:35 am

    Frank,
    You wrote, “Obviously you don’t know (Not) Don Ayotte.”
    Yes, I do know Ayotte. I feel his information is a lot more credible than yours. Kind of like your accusing past 35th RD Chair Jack Clark of giving Democrats money from his PAC. You made that up. It did not happen. What you write cannot be believed . It is all conjecture. Folks, check the facts if “Not Knotts” wrote it.

    Your wrote, “Well considering that (Not) Don Ayotte is running for office, this is of interest to some people”
    The only people interested in your reporting on Don’s reporting are the five people in your cabal.

    You wrote, “I tell people I write on a blog.”
    Do you beat your chest and roar afterward?

    You wrote, “And he printed no correction, he simply doubled down on the original mistake.”
    These are his corrections:
    “Update on the post: …the Attorney General’s office decided at the end of the business day on July 15th to retry the Bodenweiser case a second time.”
    and
    DonAyotte July 15, 2014 at 15:22
    “It has just now been released that Mr. Bodenweiser will be tried a second time.”

    I am sorry I had to point this out to you.

  8. Frank Knotts says:
    July 18, 2014 at 6:30 am

    Thank you Ricky, for again making my point. Yes I made a mistake on the 35th PAC and I acknowledged it.
    If everyone has read the post that (Not) Don Ayotte wrote and the comments he made following it, I am not sure he wrote any real correction. But if you believe so that is your right.
    And I again want to than all of those who come here to read the blog and then tell me how no one reads the blog.
    Truthbeknown? If as you say, ” Don’s much too busy on the campaign field to even read your useless blather.”, then how does he have so much time on his hands to write the post about the Bodenweiser case? How exactly does defending an accused child molester help him win an elections, I guess that is the Cindy Green school of politics.

  9. Ricky Bobby says:
    July 19, 2014 at 7:44 am

    Frank,
    To “Truthbeknown?” You wrote, “If as you say,” Don’s much too busy on the campaign field to even read your useless blather.”, then how does he have so much time on his hands to write the post about the Bodenweiser case?”
    Apparently, the case interests Ayotte. When he has info on it, he writes about it. He contributes to DE Politics. I doubt he reads your trivia unless someone points him to it.

    You wrote, “How exactly does defending an accused child molester help him win an elections…”
    Ayotte did not defend Bodenweiser in the post. He wrote,

    “The Attorney General’s office has reneged on announcing whether or not a decision on July 15th, to re-try or drop charges after a hung jury, ended the trial in a mistrial. The Attorney General’s office stated they were not obligated to tell him at that Point. Judge Bradley has scheduled a conference on July 23rd to ascertain just what course of action the Attorney General’s office wants to pursue.”

    Where in the post does Ayotte defend Bodenweiser?

    You wrote, “I guess that is the Cindy Green school of politics.”
    Since you did not explain what you mean by this comment, I can only look for the implications. Exactly when and where has Cindy Green defended Bodenweiser? Attending a few days of his trial might be construed as support for him but not as defense. Ayotte, Sam Wilson, and Sandi Minard were there too from what I have read. Where they on the defense team to?

  10. Laffter says:
    July 19, 2014 at 6:07 pm

    Context. Context. – Moseley is Ricky bobby

    Lol. Anyway (NOT) Don Ayotte left literature on my door- no door- knocking- no face to face ….. We were home all day…. ALL. DAY. LONG… Either inside or out side …

    Just tucked papers in a plastic bag and ran…… We used nitrile gloves to dispose of the trash left on our door and incinerated it- we sprayed the door with Lysol and Clorox

    Please don’t come back…..

  11. TrutheBeKnown says:
    July 20, 2014 at 1:59 pm

    Laffter
    What you are saying is not true, but then again you have been know to lie many times and your hatred for Don is well documented (edited for outing, Frank Knotts)
    Ayotte’s crew is articulate and have been told to knock at the door or ring the bell, then wait at least 45 seconds to a minute before leaving. If someone wants to talk to the candidate, they are instructed to call Don on his cell phone and Don is always in the subdivision they are working. He arrives at the house within a few minutes.
    I’ve seen Don’s crew in action and the are getting a widespread positive response.

  12. waterpirate says:
    July 20, 2014 at 4:12 pm

    We were told the same glowing field report about his run for council. A profesional should know the differance between reporting and propaganda. Please do not feed the trolls.

  13. Laffter says:
    July 20, 2014 at 7:09 pm

    Don himself isn’t articulate….. Don’t know how his KREW could be……hacks really….

    The not so subtle “I’m going to out you” tactics are so juvenile…. Don’t you tire of them? I don’t give a crop if you know or you don’t ….. It’s irrelevant to me- can’t hurt me in ANY WAY- so I don’t care…..
    At this point I’ve been everyone except the GOV himself…. Lol

    Not one person in my immediate neighborhood spoke with any KREW or Don himself-
    And if you know who I am, then you would know where I live and would therefore know what was happening in my neighborhood, which was very obvious and could be commented on here

    But you won’t …. Because Don was not here and your KREW skulked around…. My neighbors are Republicans. Normal ones and they and I would have had a field day with someone from Dons team… But nope. No one stopped to say HI!!!

    And for someone to stand at my door for a minute would be talking your life in your hands……the UPS guy won’t even come up on the porch….. So ummmm no, not who you think and
    You are full of lies

    But then, we all knew that anyway….. Nice try tho… Can’t wait for the debates. Hope Don can answer some hard questions….

  14. waterpirate says:
    July 20, 2014 at 7:19 pm

    Even if they did ring beels and knock, any data they recieve is skewed. People will say anything, agree with any one, to get them off your stoop and back to their regularly scheduled lives. Just ask the JW how many converts they get from their door knocking campaign strategy. If it were effective would not their membership be swollen?

  15. Down With Hatred says:
    July 20, 2014 at 10:04 pm

    I’ve never have seen a blog so filled with hatred and complete falsehoods. I just don’t understand people who follow a person who is so hate filled as Frank Knotts.

    I talked to Ayotte the other day and I hope he wins this race, I called him from the number on his literature and he took the time to speak freely about the issues that I was concerned and he had answers. He’s got my vote and I’m a Democrat.

  16. HTM W says:
    July 20, 2014 at 10:37 pm

    Couple of things to address here. When a person refers to Laffter as a liar they cross a line of credibility of any shape or form. Not that TBK deserves any but why go there? Wasn’t necessary.

    Down with Hatred has us LOL. There are many that don’t know hatred and they are Not Don Ayotte or his KREW. That you can spell Democrat mystifies us.

    Laffter! Well…they walk and type among us.
    WP…nice to see you back again.

  17. TrutheBeKnown says:
    July 21, 2014 at 6:25 am

    HTM W

    you crossed the line of credibility (Edited for outing, Frank Knotts) You are a worthless scumbag along with your fellow scumbag Frank.

  18. Frank Knotts says:
    July 21, 2014 at 6:57 am

    I apologize to the two guest who were attacked with outing tactics for taking so long to remove them. WARNING to the trolls, outing is an offense punishable by being banned. And while I am at it, sock-puppets are just funny, especially when the are on the same thread agreeing with each other.
    TruthBeKnown and Down With Hatred either are the same person or they share a room.

  19. Ricky Bobby says:
    July 21, 2014 at 7:05 am

    Frank,
    Look’s like you are letting me have the last word this time. Please don’t give up now!

  20. Frank Knotts says:
    July 21, 2014 at 3:01 pm

    no such luck Ricky Booby, your questions have become redundant like a child in the corner chanting, “I know you are, but what am I”. So why waste my time answering what I have? You still need to learn that my post are my playground and my rules. But if you need to think you won something, you go right ahead. The people who know, do know, and the people like yourself never will.

  21. Ricky Bobby says:
    July 22, 2014 at 6:09 am

    Frank,
    These are all legitimate questions that you should answer:

    You wrote, “How exactly does defending an accused child molester help him win an elections…”
    Where in the post does Ayotte defend Bodenweiser?

    You wrote, “I guess that is the Cindy Green school of politics.”
    Exactly when and where has Cindy Green defended Bodenweiser? Ayotte, Sam Wilson, and Sandi Minard were there (at the Bodenweiser trial) too from what I have read. Where they on the defense team to?

    These questions can be simply answered but it would take you admitting you are wrong. You can;t admit you are wrong so you choose to ignore them. WINNING!

  22. Frank Knotts says:
    July 22, 2014 at 6:32 am

    Okay Ricky, I write from the context of my life, since I have had experience and one on one conversations with the people you named, I have my personal opinion of them and their actions.
    I unlike you have knowledge of their more private opinions that they are not willing to stand behind publically. So when I see the piece NDA wrote about Bodenweiser, I have personal context to apply and yes, I see it as defending Bodenweiser.
    The same goes for Cindy Green. In personal conversations she has defended Bodenwieser, so I have no problem stating this.
    The same for Sam Wilson.
    So you don’t like me, okay, doesn’t change the fact that I know what I know, and you don’t seem to know anything beyond your hatred of me.
    Maybe you should come out of your mommy’s basement and join the real world and get some real world experience and then you would have some context from which to speak, other than your hatred of me.

Got something to say? Go for it!

←
→